Lapicosa Jewelry

But no one can question that the analysis of the causes of an undesirable situation that was already made, you can gain experience to avoid a recurrence. The cause analysis is essential for improvement. Questions like these seem to bother the authorities, but must do: Why are so dependent on oil revenues? Why not at the time was spent more investment in exploration and development of technology? Why are investments that have been made over the last seven years have been financed through bond issues in the financial markets? Why does no research and development alternative energy and are exploited because they exist? Why is imported gasoline, natural gas and LP gas?. b) Furthermore the focus of the proposal to address the challenge is based on the “accompaniment”, “support” of others. Stands out both this approach, it is precisely the cause of suspicion by the left-wing political sectors.

And their suspicions are not so unfounded. Definitely, collaboration with other companies or related entities is inevitable and in today’s global world is difficult and unaffordable, in general, develop all the technology alone and /or an entire production process. However, the way they are raised by this “accompaniment” is not by itself, the great solution to the problem of resource exploitation in the “deep water.” As mentioned in the same document the diagnosis: “There are challenges in terms of the assimilation process, selection, adaptation, implementation and management of knowledge and new technologies, for the purposes to be achieved successfully develop projects for Pemex and they are performed in the time demanded by the national needs. Moreover, it is necessary to have the capabilities to develop new technologies as they face unexpected conditions in the development of projects. In such projects, uncertainty levels are high and often requires the development of new technologies as they arise and geological technical challenges. “If the black wire was invented and not have to spend to develop it.

But if it requires a new development, what is best ‘, “hire third parties to develop, or develop it yourself, if you have the means to do so? Anyway, the third party is to recover the costs of developing technology and it will be with the patent. Perhaps it is best developed together and share the risks and benefits, and the patent if it is the case. Furthermore, as a reference for the convenience of the schemes of “accompaniment”, currently PEMEX may be associated, and in fact is associated with companies to produce gasoline. However, as mentioned, this has not represented a solution to the supply of gasoline and what at the time was a viable proposition in the short term, is now a drag on the economy, as it is imported international prices and in the process, the net result is inefficient, since it is equivalent to exchange low-quality crude and very cheap luxury gasoline (premium) and also with the extra cost of paying the “maquila” of the same, although it is only 50%. Thus, the urgency of change is questionable if they are, the premises upon which seek to justify some aspects of the model solution to the problem and above all, is questionable origin of the situation and the intention to hide it, and is that, as expected, the situation seems caused on purpose, so that ultimately there is no other alternative solution, rather than proposing.

Therefore, if a person disagrees with the lifestyle of another individual, with his way of thinking, acting, use of his the property or the pursuit of happiness, we must proceed to the dialogue, never imposing. Use force the state to impose his own ideas on how to be, behave or use of property is immoral and unacceptable. The rights of every individual from the principle of self-ownership is derived from the basic right of every human being to choose their way of life. Since life is a process of actions taken by each according to his thought, the right to choose their way of life includes freedom to take action in sustaining life and enjoy it.

This is how, the basic right to choose their way of life, derive the right to freedom of action and expression, the right to property (to support her life and the right to the pursuit of happiness) for enjoy your life. We affirm that everyone has those rights and that they should not be violated by anyone. Similarly, these rights should not be subject to a vote, as the majority has no moral authority to take away minority rights – and the world’s smallest minority is the individual. No matter what she looks like a just cause, if its achievement requires violating the rights of one person, then it is not fair, is immoral. Consider these rights in detail. The Right to Choose How Life is obvious that a person who lives alone on an island, depending on itself to survive, you can freely choose their way of life.